Statement: Why don't you go to the court if the employer does not pay you the Provident Fund contribution? Assumptions: 1 Courts can intervene in matters of dispute between employer and employees. 2 It is obligatory for the employer to pay the Prov

Statement: Why don't you go to the court if the employer does not pay you the Provident Fund contribution?

Assumptions:

Courts can intervene in matters of dispute between employer and employees.
It is obligatory for the employer to pay the Provident Fund contribution to the employees.

[A].	Only assumption I is implicit
[B].	Only assumption II is implicit
[C].	Either I or II is implicit
[D].	Neither I nor II is implicit
[E].	Both I and II are implicit

Answer: Option E

Explanation:

Clearly, the statement encourages one to go to court to get his Provident Fund from his employer. This implies that the issue comes under the jurisdiction of courts and that it is the right of the employee to claim his Provident Fund. So, both I and II are implicit.

Logical Reasoning :: Statement and Assumption : More Exercises

Statement and Assumption - Section 1

Statement: Why don't you go to the court if the employer does not pay you the Provident Fund contribution? Assumptions: 1 Courts can intervene in matters of dispute between employer and employees. 2 It is obligatory for the employer to pay the Prov

Logical Reasoning :: Statement and Assumption : More Exercises

Questions & Answers

Interviews

Jobs

Results

Admission

Admit Card

Answer Key